Showing posts with label Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Show all posts

Friday, June 12, 2020

Buffy the Patriarchy Slayer

How to write social justice fiction that doesn’t suck.
By Michael Isenberg.

Girl Power. Lesbianism. Patriarchy.

There’s no doubt that Buffy the Vampire Slayer was one of the most forward thinking shows in television history from a feminist/Progressive/social justice point of view. So how is it that it was one of the best shows ever, instead of goddamn awful like practically every other feminist/Progressive/social justice-y piece of fiction out there?

Over the course of seven seasons Buffy took on such misogynistic villains as Warren, Caleb, and Mayor Wilkins. She faced off against men who didn’t take powerful women seriously, like the werewolf hunter Cain. And she faced off against men who took powerful women so seriously that they lied and schemed to keep them in line, like the Watchers' Council and Tara’s father and brother. Indeed, we learn in the last season that one such group, the Shadow Men, started the whole Slayer line—by chaining a girl and knocking her up with demon dust. The symbolism is palpable.

Of course, by that point in the series, Buffy had long since broken free of the controlling paternalism of the Watchers’ Council; the episode where she finally tells them where to go is one of my favorites. A couple episodes that are less enjoyable, but no less significant, take on the horrific issue of violence against women. BTVS is also one of the first network shows to have major characters who are lesbians (although not the first—Willow and Tara didn’t fall in love until three years after Ellen Degeneres came out of the closet on her own show).

Buffy certainly wasn’t perfect in the SJW department. There was a noticeable absence of minority characters, although this was addressed in Season 7 with the introduction of Principal Wood and the potential slayer Rona. Better late than never. The Thanksgiving episode “Pangs” attempted to be sensitive to the plight of Native Americans at the hands of European settlers. But Buffy ends up fighting a pitched battle against the avenging Chumash spirits anyway, and Spike makes a pretty convincing speech about how he just can’t take “all this mamby-pamby boo-hooing about the bloody Indians.” And the World Culture Dance in the episode “Inca Mummy Girl,” in which the students of Sunnydale High are costumed as their favorite culture—Eskimo, Geisha, Spaghetti Western, and so on—though considered a thoughtful exercise in diversity at the time, would be a cringe-worthy exercise in cultural appropriation by today's standards. Well, both episodes meant well.

Furthermore, since the series completed its run, there have been some unsettling accusations that creator Joss Whedon isn’t quite the feminist in real life that he’d like us to believe, especially with regard to his treatment of actress Charisma Carpenter when she got pregnant during her run on Angel. Still, you’d never know it from watching Buffy.

And yet, despite its social justice cred, Buffy the Vampire Slayer is so much better than Captain Marvel, Batwoman, the Disney Star Wars trilogy, Star Trek:Discovery, and all the other recent SJW dumpster fires out there. To paraphrase Max Bialystock, where did it go right?

To answer that, here then are,

6 Lessons from BTVS on how to write social justice fiction that doesn’t suck

6. No Mary Sues. There seems to be an idea in Hollywood recently that it is somehow sexist for a female protagonist to be anything less than perfect. And so, from Rey, to Captain Marvel, to Maeve on Westworld, we’ve been treated to an interminable parade of Mary Sues. The term comes from Lieutenant Mary Sue, the heroine of a 1973 Star Trek parody, "A Trekkie's Tale". TV Tropes explains the concept as follows:

The prototypical Mary Sue is an original female character in a fanfic who obviously serves as an idealized version of the author mainly for the purpose of Wish Fulfillment. She's exotically beautiful, often having an unusual hair or eye color, and has a similarly cool and exotic name. She's exceptionally talented in an implausibly wide variety of areas, and may possess skills that are rare or nonexistent in the canon setting. She also lacks any realistic, or at least story-relevant, character flaws — either that or her "flaws" are obviously meant to be endearing.

The irony of all this is that many real-life women complain about the excessively high expectations that society has of them—they need to be the perfect career woman, the perfect wife, the perfect mother, always keeping their homes looking perfectly beautiful and themselves perfectly coiffed. The Mary Sue is the exact opposite of the role model they want.

Then there’s Buffy. Yes, exceptional talent comes with the Slayer package. But it doesn’t come for free—she has to train constantly to “hone her skills,” as Giles likes to say. Even when she doesn’t want to—a common occurrence in the early episodes. She’s not always a great student. On rare occasions, she even loses a fight. Win or lose, fighting takes its toll on the coif.

More significantly, Buffy never wanted this Destiny that's been thrust upon her. Many of the early episodes involve the conflict within her, and between her and Giles, as she tries to evade her responsibility to destroy unspeakable evil, in favor of her natural bent for "girly things," often lying to Giles or her mom in the process. Inevitably, the responsibilities always catch up with her.

On top of that, Buffy makes mistakes. Like the time in the Doublemeat Palace, when she becomes convinced (incorrectly) that the burgers were made out of people, and she runs amok through the restaurant, knocking hamburgers out of the hands of stunned diners.

As Buffy gains experience, and her challenges became bigger, so do her mistakes. In one of the last episodes of the series, she leads her army of potential Slayers into a battle they weren't ready for. Several of them get killed and Xander loses an eye.

Not only is Buffy not a Mary Sue, but the series even makes fun of the concept. Or to be precise, it makes fun of the male equivalent, variously called a Gary Sue or a Mary Stu. In the episode “Superstar,” the nerdy, hapless Jonathan cast a spell to make himself the best at everything. It was an entertaining takedown of the trope.

Regardless whether your character is a Mary Sue or a Mary Stu, the problem is the same—the Superman problem. The Man of Steel is so powerful that he can overcome nearly any obstacle without struggling. And that’s bad fiction; it’s boring to watch. Far better to give your character some flaws which not only raise the stakes in the conflict, but give your viewers an emotional investment in watching her overcome them.

5. Create characters who are characters, not political statements. Today’s books, movies, and TV are filled with same-sex couples. But I can’t think of any who are as endearing as Willow and Tara in BTVS. There are two reasons for this. One is the wonderful chemistry between the two actresses, Alyson Hannigan and Amber Benson. The other is that they were brought together by the internal logic of the characters, and not some social justice imperative.

The writers started laying the groundwork almost a year before Tara even appeared:

In addition to this longstanding latent homosexuality, Willow knew she needed help to take her magic abilities to the next level, so she sought out other witches. Which is how she met Tara, whose family had conditioned her to think of herself as a freak. That left her shy, withdrawn, a bit frumpy. As she sang in the Season 6 musical episode,

I saw a world enchanted,
Spirits and charms in the air.
I always took for granted
I was the only one there.

So it was normal that when she found there was someone else there, she’d be drawn to her.

Suddenly I knew
Everything I dreamed was true.

It felt completely natural, not something that was forced on the viewers merely to be progressive.

After Tara died, Willow was asked how long she had been drawn to women. Her reply captures exactly what made that love story work so well. “It wasn’t women. It was woman. Just one…My mom was all proud, like I was making some political statement. And then the statement mojo wore off, and I was just gay.”

4. Don’t build up your female characters by tearing down your male characters. Buffy and Willow may have “put the grr in grrl,” but not at the expense of the men in their lives. Giles, Angel, Spike, and, in his own goofy way, Xander, are strong characters in their own right, and even when they are in conflict with Buffy, there is no question that they all care about and love each other.

The relationship between Buffy and Giles stands out in this regard. His role as mentor is a traditionally patriarchal one, a father figure for Buffy, a substitute for her actual father, who grows increasingly distant as the series progresses. And yet, contrary to the usual left-wing narrative about patriarchy, as Buffy's skills and independence grow, Giles doesn’t try to hold her back in order to maintain his control of her. Just the opposite. “It’s becoming quite obvious that Buffy doesn’t need me anymore,” he says in Season 5. “I don’t say that in a self-pitying way; I’m quite proud actually.” By Season 6 he worries that he’s become a crutch to her, and is holding her back; he returns to England in order to allow her to reach her full potential.

What a contrast to more recent movies and TV shows—Captain Marvel and Maleficent for example—where every male character is either a villain, a buffoon, or a servant to the superior female heroine.

3. Don’t preach. At least not overtly.

A lot of the social justice themes I talked about above weren’t apparent to me the first time I watched the series. Or the second or the third. I only became aware of them later on, thanks in part to The Passion of the Nerd’s excellent series of Buffy episode guides, which points them out explicitly. Nevertheless, I was absorbing them on a subconscious level. And there’s a lesson in that. If you got a message you want to get across, get your viewers so invested in your story and your characters that they don’t even notice they’re being preached to.

Besides, overt preaching violates the first rule of storytelling that we all learned in English class: Show, don’t tell.

2. Humor. No one likes the stereotype of the humorless liberal. Captain Marvel and Rey in particular have about as many laughs in them as a case of syphilis. Which is ironic because one episode of BTVS actually got laughs out of a case of syphilis. In Joss’s immortal words, “Make it dark, make it grim, make it tough, but then, for the love of God, tell a joke.”

1. A good social justice story must be, first and foremost, a good story. It might seem strange to cite Rush Limbaugh in post about social justice fiction, but bear with me. From time to time, Rush has been asked how come there’s no liberal Rush Limbaugh. His answer is that it's because everyone who tried went about it the wrong way. They were more interested in pushing a message than in crafting good radio. Which is backwards.

What’s true for radio is also true for television.

Lord knows there have been few TV shows as well-crafted as Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Great characters, clever dialog (the writers are incredibly proud of that), well-choreographed violence, and in the end, good vanquishes evil. Besides, as editor-in-chief of Nerds who Read, I gotta love any show where the heroes, when they face a problem, go to the library and look stuff up in books.

And that's one final lesson that our left-of-center friends can learn from Buffy if they want their fiction not to suck. The library—not to mention Hollywood—is full of great stories and memorable characters. Rather than decolonizing our bookshelves, as a recent article on NPR called for, draw on the best that every culture, race, and religion has to offer. Including a certain blonde high school girl who "alone will stand against the vampires the demons and the forces of darkness. She is the Slayer."

Michael Isenberg drinks bourbon and writes novels. His latest book, The Thread of Reason, is a murder mystery that takes place in Baghdad in the year 1092, and tells the story of the conflict between science and shari’ah in medieval Islam. It is available on Amazon.com

Please follow Mike on Facebook and Twitter.

Subscribe to Nerds who Read.

Friday, December 13, 2019

7 Things that Still Bug Me about Buffy the Vampire Slayer

And The One Most Awesome Scene Ever.
by Michael Isenberg.

Buffy the Vampire Slayer was my favorite show of all time. A perfect storm of good storylines, quality violence, a great cast, and amazing dialogue (to hear what the writers have to say about the last item—they’re incredibly proud of it, and rightly so—see this segment “Buffy Speak” from the Season 3 DVDs). The show was known for innovative episodes like "Hush" which had no dialog for twenty-seven minutes and "The Body" which captured the numbness of those first hours after a loved one dies with remarkable realism. Buffy was also breakthrough television in the portrayal of lesbian characters. And as editor of Nerds who Read, I got to love any show where the heroes, when they have a problem, go to the library to research it.

Perhaps it was because Buffy was such great television that the handful of things about it that bugged me continue to bug me twenty years later. Here, then, are…

7 Things that Still Bug Me About Buffy the Vampire Slayer

7. Robots. The Buffy TV show was born amidst the “irrational exuberance” of the dot com era, so it no doubt seemed natural at the time to work some high tech into it. But in a show that was mainly about the supernatural, and where the main villains were vampires and demons, robots never really seem to belong. They just came across as silly.

Bonus challenge: Name all the robots that appeared in the series. Leave answers in the comments.

6. The Zeppo. The title of this Season 3 episode refers to Xander, practically the only member of the Scooby Gang who never had any supernatural powers. The comparison is to Zeppo Marx, the colorless Marx Brother. Unlike the mustachioed, wisecracking Groucho, the silent, manic Harpo, and the faux-Italian Chico, Zeppo was just a guy in a suit. The straight man. In this episode, Buffy and her friends decide that the threat of the week was just too dangerous for Xander, so they cut him out. He goes off on his own adventure while the rest of the gang stops the Apocalypse in the background. As if that's not bad enough, much of Xander’s adventure involves being unable to get away from some tiresome people he really doesn’t want to be with. As an introvert, I identify. And while things do work out for Xander in the end—he even loses his virginity—it still bugs me that his friends were mean to him.

5. Season 5. In this season, Buffy faces off against Glory, a slinky, glamorous hell god whose only wish is to go back to hell. Unfortunately, opening a portal to that alternate dimension will require killing Buffy’s sister, Dawn. Clare Kramer puts in a wonderful performance as Glory—she really captures the combination of ancient evil and modern humor that’s the hallmark of a Buffy villain. But I really don’t see the conflict here. Glory wants out of this dimension. Buffy wants Glory out of this dimension. Why are they fighting instead of working together?! I mean, seriously, THEY WANT THE SAME THING!!! With the resources of the Scooby Gang, surely they could have found some non-lethal way to send Glory home. It’s not as if they had never sent anyone to alternate dimensions before.

4. Season 6. A low point for the series, and for Buffy personally, who is working fast food to pay the bills, having sex with a vampire who makes her feel ashamed of herself, and struggling to be a single mother to little sis Dawn. To add insult to injury, just as she approaches bottom, her ex, Riley, comes to visit and he’s doing great. It’s painful to watch, but not as painful as two scenes of horrific violence against women that appear in this season.

From a dramatic point of view, the season is flawed in that “The Big Bad”—the three nerds Warren, Jonathan, and Andrew (Tucker’s brother)—just aren’t that bad. Even some of the Scooby Gang think the Trio’s schemes “seem really lame.” (I can just hear the Cinema Sins guy saying, “Comment in the writer’s room somehow made it into the script.”) The Trio aren’t worthy of Buffy talents. In fact, they were such weak villains that they’re not even the main antagonists in the season finale. That honor goes to Willow, who has temporarily turned evil. And then Buffy doesn’t even play much of a role in defeating her. She spends most of the last episode trapped in a hole.

Even the comic relief doesn’t work in Season 6. Kitten poker? In Buffy’s words, that’s “stupid currency.”

Just an awful season.

And yet, there are a few bright spots, in particular the musical episode “Once More with Feeling.” Frankly, most musical episodes of TV shows aren’t very good, but this one is an exception. It’s fun, the songs are great, and it blends seamlessly with the arc of the season. There’s just one thing about it that bugs me…

3. No consequences for Xander. The premise of “Once More with Feeling” is that citizens of Buffy’s town of Sunnydale just start singing and dancing, like in a musical, and Buffy must find out why. It’s rather lighthearted at first, but then there is new urgency as some of these people dance themselves to death. We eventually find out that a demon caused it all. A demon that was summoned by Xander. “I didn’t know what was going to happen,” he says in his defense. “I just thought there was going to be dances and songs.” He totally should have known what was going to happen. It’s fricking season six, you’re not new at this. Or did you forget what happened when you messed around with the Dark Arts in “Bewitched, Bothered, and Bewildered?” Not only did he summon the demon in “Once More with Feeling,” but then he just sat there and watched his friends struggle to figure out what was going on. He even misdirected them at one point. Not to mention that people died.

And yet, there were no consequences for him at all. This was unusual in a series that, to its credit, takes personal responsibility seriously. When characters screw up, there are consequences. There was even an episode called “Consequences.” If it’s a serious screw up, there might be a long journey of redemption, spanning multiple seasons. But in this case, nothing. No day of reckoning for Xander at all. DID I MENTION THAT PEOPLE DIED???!!!

2. The Willow Hostage Exchange. As the title of the Season 3 episode “Choices” implies, Buffy and her friends faced some difficult decisions that week. They knew that the mayor of the town planned to transform himself into a giant snake demon and kill a whole bunch of people. But in order to accomplish this, he needed a mystical box full of killer spiders known as the “Box of Gavrok.” The Scooby Gang steals the box from him, but during the operation, one of them, Willow, gets captured.

The choice they face is whether to keep the box, and thereby stop the mayor’s “Ascension.” It could save thousands of lives, but Willow would be killed. Or they could offer the mayor an exchange—the box for Willow—and keep their fingers crossed that they can find some other way to stop the Ascension.

Of course they went for the exchange—Willow’s a main character—but I often wonder how the rest of the series would have played out if they had sacrificed her instead. Yes, Willow would have been dead, but a heck of a lot of other people would have been alive—starting with the ones that died in the Ascension that didn’t get stopped. Subsequent to that, Willow repeatedly put other people in danger by her misuse of magic—at first because she was still learning, and later because she was addicted to it. None of it would have happened had she died in “Choices.”

Buffy herself died in the Season 5 finale, and Willow mojoed her back to life. Had Willow not been there to do that, a Buffy-less and Willow-less Season 6 would have played out very differently and we certainly wouldn’t have seen Willow turn to the Dark Side and nearly destroy the world in the season finale. And since the Big Bad in Season 7 was unleashed by the unintended consequences of bringing Buffy back to life, that whole season wouldn’t have happened at all. The numerous potential Slayers who died would never have been in danger.

Also, had Willow died in Season 3, she never would have met Tara. And although that would have meant that she wouldn’t have been there to bring the shy Tara out of her shell, it also would have meant that Tara wouldn’t have been in the path of a stray bullet meant for Buffy. Which brings me to the number one thing that still bugs me about Buffy the Vampire Slayer...

The Death of Tara

Tara was one of my favorite characters. She had such a good heart, and such a unique way of looking at things—making up her own names for the constellations because the real ones didn’t make sense, or avoiding the Internet because everyone’s spelling was so bad. Unlike Willow, she was able to use magic without being consumed by it. I even loved the way she decorated her room (I wish I could get a copy of that poster!). I was very sad to see her go, especially since series creator Joss Whedon played with our heads a bit. He put Tara in the opening credits for the first time in the episode in which she died. I went into the episode thinking how nice it was that her place on the show was finally secure.

Thanks for bearing with my rant. I would like to end on a positive note, though. So here then, as promised, is...

The One Most Awesome Scene Ever:

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Riley Punches Parker Abrams in the Face:

How can anyone not love Riley after that?

Got any pet peeves about BTVS that I missed? Please feel free to comment.

Michael Isenberg drinks bourbon and writes novels. His latest book, The Thread of Reason, is a murder mystery that takes place in Baghdad in the year 1092, and tells the story of the conflict between science and shari’ah in medieval Islam. It is available on Amazon.com

Please follow Mike on Facebook and Twitter.

Photo credit(s): Hello Giggles, The Uncanny Fans, buffy.fandom.com, fanpop.com, Lost Again, YouTube, Persephone Magazine, DigitalSpy.com, Entertainment Weekly

Friday, October 11, 2019

Not your Dress-up Doll

Battle Angel Alita, Vol. 1-5, by Yukito Kishiro.
Book Review by Michael Isenberg.

I missed Alita: Battle Angel at the theater earlier this year, and am only just now getting caught up, thanks to streaming video. I found it very entertaining, with kickass fight scenes and real heart.

But as I always say, this is Nerds who Read. So, although comparisons with the movie are inevitable, my review today focuses on the original nine-part 1990-95 Battle Angel Alita manga, or to be precise, the five-volume 2017 “Deluxe Edition” re-release (each volume except the last contains two parts).

Some of the story will be familiar to viewers of the movie: How the cyber-doctor Daisuke Ido finds the head and shoulders of a cybernetic warrior discarded in the post-Apocalyptic “Scrapyard.” How he rebuilds her and names her Alita. How she joins him as a hunter-warrior, bounty hunters in a long, twilight struggle against rogue cyborgs. And how Alita fell into a star-crossed romance with the street urchin/handyman/spine snatcher Yugo, whose only goal in life is to leave the Scrapyard and move on up to the mysterious “floating utopia” of Zalem.

Mercifully, the manga does not include the tiresome Jack Skellington part of the story, the sequence in the movie in which the newly-rebuilt but amnesiac Alita darts about the Scrapyard, gleefully exclaiming “What’s that?” at each new sight. On this point, the manga is definitely superior to the movie: we get to the action that much faster (Yeah, I know. Jack actually said, "What's this?" But I think my point is clear).

In spite of this and some other added material, the makers of the Alita: Battle Angel movie (as well as the makers of the 1993 OVA) deserve praise for staying true to the source material, right down to duplicating some of the manga’s most iconic images.

But the movie covers little more than Volume 1 of the manga. After that, Alita goes on to have many new adventures, love interests, and battles. Volume 2 fleshes out her Motorball career. Volumes 3-5 revolve around the relationship between the surface dwellers and Zalem. The floating city imposes a cruel tyranny over the inhabitants below. Zalem appropriates nearly all the resources and manufactured goods of the planet’s surface, only enforces the laws to the extent that they bolster its own interests, and uses the Scrapyard as a dumping ground, with imagery that anticipates the Devil’s Anus in Thor:Ragnarok by two decades.

The people of the surface revolt in what becomes known as the “Barjack Rebellion”, led by the sometime Samurai, sometime centaur, always dangerous Den. Den is interesting in the way that Killmonger from Black Panther is interesting. He’s definitely the villain, and yet one can’t help thinking, “He has a point.” In any case, he turns out to be not what he seems.

We also see a lot more of Desty Nova in these later volumes, who we glimpsed in the movie, the Ed Norton character pulling strings behind the scenes.

My one complaint about the manga is I often found the fight scenes hard to follow. Seriously, what’s going on here?

But aside from that, I think this is a wonderful series. Part of its strength comes from the relationships between Alita and the people around her, in particular Yugo and Dr. Ido. In this respect she reminds me of another diminutive 1990s action heroine, Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

Alita’s crush on Yugo is far more layered than in the movie, a beautifully true-to-life portrayal of a teenager in love. She falls hard for this cute boy with a cool bandana and an adorable smirk who knows where he’s going. She waits outside his house all night for him to come home. She does his laundry and makes plans for their future together, at least when she’s not staring out over the city and moping about whether they have a future together. Alas, although he does like her, he’s not as into her as she is into him; he has his own thing going on. Thanks to these nuances, his choices later in the story make a lot more sense than they do on the Big Screen.

But it is Alita’s relationship with Dr. Ido that is the most touching, one of father and daughter. It’s not perfect. Sometimes he’s a great sounding board, for example listening sympathetically, albeit with a touch of amusement, to her romantic problems. Other times she has to lay down the law with him, as when he tries to forbid her from becoming a hunter-warrior.

Indeed the whole plotline about the Barjack rebels is just a side-mission for Alita: she crosses their path while on a multiyear quest across ruined landscapes to find Ido, who has gone missing. Through it all, they both make mistakes, some of which have serious consequences. But they do it because they care about each other.

Comparisons between Alita and Captain Marvel are ubiquitous on the web, and for good reason: both of their movies came out around the same time, both are women with incredible powers who do not remember their origins, and are therefore on quests to find out who they are. Both their mentors try to hold them back, ultimately without success. But IMHO, it’s these relationships with their mentors that set the two superheroines apart. Ido is motivated by love for Alita and holds her back, and even opposes her sometimes, in a misguided effort to keep her out of danger. Captain Marvel, in contrast, is a feminist parable in which her mentor, Yon-Rogg is the very embodiment of The Patriarchy; he holds her back because he wants to control her. Indeed all the males in her life are awful—with the exception of those who are comic relief.

I think this gap between the emotional resonance of Alita and the coldness of Captain Marvel is why audiences split on the two movies the way they did. As of the time I write this, Alita has a 93% audience approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes, compared with only 53% for Captain Marvel. Interestingly, the critics, more politically correct, split the other way, 61% for Alita and 78% for Captain Marvel (For a more in-depth analysis of Alita, Captain Marvel, and feminism, see Ian Kummer’s post, “Alita, the Battle Angel, fights her feminist critics” on the Fabius Maximus website).

The other marvelous thing about the Battle Angel is that she’s just so badass. Absolutely unstoppable. In one fight, her opponent literally tears her limb from limb, until there is nothing left of her but her head, shoulders, and one arm. And yet, she wasn't finished. Which brings me to another comparison with Buffy, specifically the Slayer’s fight against Angel in the season 2 finale. Angel has her on the ropes and taunts her, “That's everything, huh? No weapons...no friends...no hope...Take all that away and what's left?”

“Me,” Buffy replies.

Alita shares Buffy's spirit, but is a little more primal about it. When it was her turn to be stripped of everything, she merely screamed out a battle cry and, pushing off with her one arm, jumped back into the fight.

Michael Isenberg drinks bourbon and writes novels. His latest book, The Thread of Reason, is a murder mystery that takes place in Baghdad in the year 1092, and tells the story of the conflict between science and shari’ah in medieval Islam. It is available on Amazon.com

Photo Credit(s): Battle Angel Alita Kindle Edition, Fabius Maximus website, IMDB